pinartarhan.com

Fun and comprehensive entertainment blog feat. movies, TV series, actors, movie-makers, music & books: 1980 - Present

  • Home
  • Hire Me
  • Books
  • Privacy Policy

Edge of Tomorrow starring Tom Cruise & Emily Blunt: Smart, Fast, Funny, Emotional

Posted on June 11, 2014 Written by ripitup

Share

Edge of Tomorrow starring Tom Cruise & Emily Blunt: Smart, Fast, Funny, Emotional
Edge of Tomorrow starring Tom Cruise and Emily Blunt
Image via comingsoon.net

Premise

Aliens called Mimics have invaded the earth, and they are winning. Humans’ chance of survival has increased slightly with the invention of metal suits with several weapons.

The war’s one of the most successful and courageous soldiers is British sergeant Rita (Emily Blunt), also called Full Metal Bitch.

Major Cage (Tom Cruise) is the PR specialist of the US army, an advertising guy who had to join the military after losing his business. Before another battle with the Mimics led by British general Brigham (Brendan Gleeson), Brigham asks Cage to lead a film crew, and record what’s supposed to be a not-so-deadly front.

But when the freaked out Cage declines, and tries to blackmail his way out of it, Brigham sends him off to a base as a fresh recruit/runner, and poor Cage is sent to fight a war with no skills and no knowledge of the weapons they need to wear.

But the supposed mild battle turns into a bloodbath as the aliens knew they were coming, and Cage doesn’t make it through the day alive.

Except he wakes up, day reset, right when he first met his commander Farrell (Will Paxton) yesterday. He can’t figure his way out, and he can’t survive again.

But the day keeps resetting, and when Rita understands what he’s going through, she tells him to find her when he wakes up.

So they start training, and with the help of the brilliant but literally resourceless Carter (Noah Taylor), they try to find a way to win the war.

*

Edge of Tomorrow is the ideal big budget movie: it has great CGI to justify the cost, riveting plot, a lot of action with heart, decent character development and with enough emotional and funny moments to balance the sci-fi and action.

What I especially liked is that our protagonist isn’t a born, trained or willing fighter in the beginning. He’s just a regular, albeit well-educated and healthy, Joe who doesn’t want to die on a battlefield. He’s no soldier. His being in the army isn’t by choice, really. Cruise’s transition from the funny blood-averse man to the mandatory kick-ass soldier is well-performed, and well-timed.

It’s currently 8.2 on IMDB voted by about 40,000 users, and I think it even deserves a 9.

COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE FILM (Not Mine)

Of course there are some popular complaints about the movie, but most of them aren’t relevant to the plot. Let’s go over them one by one anyway:

1)    The lead should have been Asian.

Because the script was adapted from a Japanese graphic novel called All You Need Is Kill, loyal readers aren’t happy the lead is the very white Tom Cruise.

The point is, not everyone reads all graphic novels. I know I don’t. I didn’t even know what the script was based on before researching details after I’ve seen it.

But we are talking about a 178-million-dollar movie here. It doesn’t matter which ethnicity the actor comes from. The producers want to take the least risky path, and who better to front a movie like this than Cruise?

His action/sci-fi movie revenue record speaks for itself. He is also an Oscar-nominated actor (3 times). So basically, if I were a director/studio executive/producer, and could get someone like Tom Cruise or Denzel Washington, I’d be crazy not to.

2)    Tom Cruise is 51.

And? The graphic novel character might be a 25-year-old, but his character is this movie is a Major in the US military. He’s also supposed to have his own advertising business before joining the military. Add the numbers up, and his age makes a lot of sense.

One could argue 51 is too old for to lead an action-packed movie, but if the actor is fit and badass enough, who cares how old he is? And I’m not the only one who thinks Cruise is fantastic for his age or any age in general.

3)    Emily Blunt is 3o.

You can hardly tell there’s a two-decade age gap. She looks ageless, and so does he. They have great chemistry, and they are terrific in their parts. Also, this movie isn’t about their characters falling in love, getting married and raising kids together. Yes, there’s an emotional connection, but considering their circumstances, it makes more sense than majority of the action romances/pairings Hollywood has presented.

4)    The ending doesn’t make sense.

In order not to give spoilers here I won’t get specific. But I find the ending quite right. It fits the logic of the world described in the movie. And since what happens in the end (and what causes it) is the first time it happens in the movie, so previous events can’t be used to refute it.

*

Personally, I loved the movie in its entirety. If there’s a sequel, I will watch it. But I think I prefer this one as a one-off.

 

Favorite Moments

–       How Tom Cruise recites everyone’s lines before they could say anything to make his point.

–       How his character logically and emotionally transforms from an ordinary, violence-averse guy to a leader true/hero through training and what he experiences.

–       The relationship between Rita (Blunt) and Cage (Cruise). It’s for the most part a friendship/comradeship. But an emotional bond is inevitably formed, and not just because Cage gets to experience the same day with different events with her, and getting to know her, but also because she can empathize with him. Even though she technically spends one day with him, he tells her what happened, how she died and how they can last longer. She also had the time-resetting ability he did before.

–       She just shoots him whenever he gets injured or risks captivity. The loss of his own blood, and transfusion of new blood, will cause him to lose the ability, hence forever destroying their chance of winning the war.

 

*

Please do share what you think about Edge of Tomorrow.

*

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Edge of Tomorrow, edge of tomorrow cast, edge of tomorrow movie, edge of tomorrow movie review, Emily Blunt, emily blunt edge of tomorrow, Tom Cruise, tom cruise edge of tomorrow

Why I Don’t Mind Sparkly Vampires, Pretty Aliens or 30-Year-Olds Playing Teenagers

Posted on May 8, 2014 Written by ripitup

Share

matt-lanter-star-crossed-roman-emery
Matt Lanter, born in 1983, stars as the lead alien Roman in the TV series Star-Crossed.Image via justjared.com. Pretty alien, and a 30-something playing a high school kid. I approve, though:)

It doesn’t matter if the ratings of a supernatural TV show with pretty supernatural characters is high or low. It doesn’t matter if the book about the love between a shining pretty vampire and a human girl tops the bestsellers list or is published into oblivion.

If the said creatures were formerly written as ugly, weird and vicious at one point, there’ll always be people complaining about the beauty of these characters.

If you are lucky and have hooked your audience with your actors, stories and characters, the vamps looking gorgeous won’t be a problem. True Blood (yeah, yeah they show teeth but Billy and Eric aren’t your average-looking guys, let’s be fair.) and The Vampire Diaries managed to bypass the problem. While watchers, fans and haters critique the hell out of the show (Vampire Diaries), they’re concerned with plot points, and not beauty issues. They’ve accepted the fact that the cast members look like they have sprung from a fashion catalogue. They can act, and they fit their roles.

So whether I like the episodes of a certain supernatural show/movie or not, it feels refreshing when the criticism focuses on plot, and not looks.

As much criticism as Stephenie Meyer faced about the quality of her writing, people were a lot more passionate about the “shining” vampires. How dare she make a vampire not burn in the sun? Frankly, I embrace vampires who don’t burn in the sun. It’s refreshing. As a 29-year-old entertainment addict, I’ve seen enough ugly-ass vampires who couldn’t go out in the light.

Jonathan Rhys Meyers as Dracula in NBC's Dracula
Jonathan Rhys Meyers as Dracula in NBC’s Dracula. Image via fandomobsessed.com. Jonathan is one hot vampire, and he doesn’t even look his best in the show.

Dracula (starring Jonathan Rhys Meyers) series got its fair share of the complaints, and Star-Crossed series discussion boards are filled with people comparing it to Twilight. Yeah because why should other writers explore a love story between a supernatural creature and a human? And how could a writer allow himself to envision an alien without disgusting features? Yes, I’m being sarcastic.

Man, writers can’t catch a break. We sweat and bleed to get our work sold. And if we’ve managed to sell it to TV, have it made into a pilot and have that pilot picked by a network, we then have to struggle week after week to not just create an enticing story, but to try to create an enticing story that will bring high ratings.

As viewers, I get “we” don’t care about the writer’s (hard) work. We demand compelling, fun work. Fair enough. There might be writers out there who give in to the popularity of a certain (sub-)genre, but in general, writers write from heart, mind and soul. I know I do.

 

Image via ign.com. Vamped-up Angel (David Boreanaz - pre-Bones days). Not the ugliest undead guy out there, but he has looked better See the pic. below:
Image via ign.com. Vamped-up Angel (David Boreanaz – pre-Bones days). Not the ugliest undead guy out there, but he has looked better See the pic. below:
David Boreanaz, Sarah Michelle Gellar
Image via comicvine.com. David Boreanaz with Sarah Michelle Gellar. And people are complaining Twilight vampires are pretty?:)

One writer depicts vampires are sparkly creatures, one with ridiculous fangs, one with a made-up ugly face (Buffy The Vampire Slayer and Angel, anyone?).

One writer can make a serial-killing psychotic couple protagonists (Natural Born Killers), and one can choose to make a hitman protect a 12-year-old  at all costs (you know this one too well).

I don’t care if a vampire looks horrendous or gorgeous. I don’t care if an alien is a green reptile or birth-marked teen or just a regular-looking human with special powers. Do I care for the story? Am I invested in what they do? That’s all that matters.

So yeah, as a writer, I’m completely on the writers’ side.  Yes, it helps that I don’t mind attractive characters. You can go all the way to my childhood and blame it on my parents for taking me to see Dirty Dancing at the age of 3. When you introduce Patrick Swayze to a girl, it’s unsurprising she’ll grow up to have a thing for good-hearted rebellious hunks (and romance and dancing). Don’t almost all the male protagonists of mentioned shows/films/books fit this criteria?

But my tendencies aside, this is the writer’s child. Their story. Yes, they want to be read/watched and admired. But from idea inception to the end product, it’s the writer’s baby. It’s her choice if she wants to go with Bram Stoker’s baby-eating dracula, or she wants to make him a tortured, a handsome, revenge- warrior like the series (Dracula).

The "ugly" leads of Supernatural: Jensen Ackles (on the right) and Jared Padalecki. Image via supernatural.wikia.com.
The “ugly” leads of Supernatural: Jensen Ackles (on the right) and Jared Padalecki. Image via supernatural.wikia.com.

It’s their choice if they just want a show on vampires, or if they want to add all sorts of creatures we have never heard of (Supernatural introduced some bizarre stuff). And despite being created by a guy, the two human leads of Supernatural are not exactly ugly. (Yes, major understatement here.)

A Note on The Cast Ages:

Of course the other famous complaint is the casting of “older” actors as high school peers, but I for one can speak for myself: they are possibly doing it for the “older” crowd like me. I like romance and supernatural stuff. But I don’t write YA, and I don’t particularly seek to watch/read YA. So what can you do to make it more appealing? You cast actors aged 20-30 so we get to be “attracted” to the leading character. I see the logic, since at 29, I find Dylan McDermott way more appealing than, let’s say, Taylor Lautner. OK, I find Dylan McDermott more appealing than a lot of people, but that’s another issue.

dylan-mcdermott
Dylan McDermott image via tvguide.com. A terrific actor who happens to look awesome. Did I mention he is over 50?

I don’t watch shows because they are set in high school. I watch them despite of that.

Besides, actors playing younger characters is such an old tradition. Michael J. Fox was born in 1962, so in the first Back to the Future film, he was 23. Grease is a favorite across generations, with high school students Olivia Newton-John being 29 and John Travolta 24. Would you even consider replacing them with actors at the “right” age? I wouldn’t dream of it.

 

*

What’s your take on pretty creatures and “older” casting?

Share

Filed Under: Books & Authors, Movies and Actors, TV shows Tagged With: david boreanaz angel, dylan mcdermott, jonathan rhys meyers dracula, matt lanter, matt lanter star-crossed, pretty aliens, sparkling vampires, star-crossed, star-crossed tv series, Supernatural, supernatural tv show

Labor Day: A Slow But Rewarding Movie For The Ultimate Romantics

Posted on April 29, 2014 Written by ripitup

Share

Josh Brolin, Kate Winslet, Labor Day
Image via heyuguys.co.uk

 

 

Labor Day starring Kate Winslet and Josh Brolin

Adele’s (Kate Winslet) husband (Clark Gregg) has left her for his secretary, and she lives with her son Henry. Henry is pretty much the only joy in her isolated and depressed existence.

She leaves her house once a month with Henry for groceries, and this is where escaped convict Frank (Josh Brolin) enlists their help. I say “enlist”, because even though he does subtly hint they don’t have a choice, and keeps Henry closeby, you could say this is the nicest hostage-taking situation ever. (Yep, I know how weird it sounds.) Frank asks them to drive to their house.

Once there, he tells them he only needs to hide until trains start, and he doesn’t mean any harm. At first Adele is skeptical and defensive, but Frank proves his kind nature by taking good care of them. After he realizes there might not be a train due to the holiday, he proves to be the best house guest ever by taking the chores upon himself, and being a better housemate/partner/father than Henry’s father ever was in the short span of time. He and Adele share an immense connection –so much so that Adele doesn’t want him to leave.

Of course hiding a convict in a small town full of nosy people isn’t easy. Add to this Henry’s confused adoloscent mindset and his new manipulative friend…and let’s say, the tension picks up…

*

Based on Joyce Maynard’s novel, Labor Day is a modest, slow but sincere film. The acting is really good, and even if you want to dismiss some of the dialogue as sappy, you can’t. Josh Brolin owns his character: a gentle guy who did something horrible without intending to, and Kate Winslet is just lovely. She transforms gracefully from sad and tired to passionate and lively. And given both their pasts with the opposite sex (Frank’s is slowly revealed through flashbacks), and how opposite they are personally to those people (and not to mention, how attractive both Kate and Josh are), the romance, commitment and passion make a lot of sense.

Speaking of flashbacks, the choice for young Brolin (Tom Lipinski) just might be the best younger version casting choice I’ve ever seen. They look so much alike, you could imagine Lipinski as Brolin in the future.

 

The only thing that bothered me as how Henry – the kid- starts as a lovely, thoughtful and insightful kid but then makes such naive, silly choices that makes you wonder if it’s the same kid. That said, this is not a complaint about the story. Yes, he is an adolescent. And he is somewhat isolated. Combine hormones and the complexity/novelty of the situation, it makes sense. I was just really disappointed because I expected more from him.

The movie also features two fun cameos from James Van Der Beek and J.K. Simmons. The movie was adapted and directed by Jason Reitman (Juno, Up in the Air, Thank You For Smoking).

I recommed Labor Day to all romantics. Is the ending sad? Yes and no. It’d frankly be my third preffered ending. If you see the movie, we can discuss those in the comments. Would hate to spoil things for you.

After all, this is not a romantic comedy. The ending isn’t that clear, though of course you can feel it coming at some point.

But I absolutely loved Brolin’s character.

Let me know what you think.:)

P S I decided to read the book to see how they compare.

 

 

 

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Clark Gregg, Jason Reitman, josh brolin, josh brolin labor day, kate winslet, kate winslet labor day, labor day, labor day cast, labor day movie, labor day movie review

Endless Love starring Alex Pettyfer & Gabriela Wilde – A Glass Half-Full Review

Posted on March 3, 2014 Written by ripitup

Share

Endless Love movie poster
Image via lastyearsgirl.pixlet.net

When you look at this romantic drama’s 6.7 rating on IMDB (by over 3,000 people), and the reviews/rants on its board, you’d think the fans rated a 10 because there aren’t many that speak favorably of the film. Or maybe they’re not just as vocal.

But since the movie has an abundance of bashing on its behalf including the book’s author (who of course has a right not to be happy with the result), I’m here to give the movie a break.

Because guess what? It’s nothing more or less than what the trailer suggests. A sweet, sexy (yes, somehow the movie manages to be both) love story with no surprises and mostly familiar actors (feat. Bruce Greenwood and Joely Richardson as the Wilde’s character’s parents.

The glass half-empty or the glass entirely empty review would go something like this:

It’s naive, clichéd and totally unrealistic (as in overly optimistic) flick that has nothing to new to offer. But then again, when that’s not the movie’s intention at all, why criticize it about it?

Because sometimes, let’s face it, some of us get in the mood for some easy watching. Something not-depressing (I’m still not tempted to watch Blue Valentine, despite its cast), something that offers pure escapism with beautiful scenery, pretty actors, a familiar love story and some easy-to-identify with problems. (Hands up if your dad or another family member totally didn’t get your choices or personality for a long time.)

But let’s take you over the plot, and then the relaxed review (that might offer some spoilers in its defense):

Jade is an introverted, beautiful girl who realizes that she hasn’t really made an impact on anyone’s life in high school. She was bookish, and was cocooned by her parents (especially her father) after the death of her older brother.

Endless Love
Image via theguardian.com

David (Alex Pettyfer) went to the same school, harboring a crush on Jade, but never quite acting on it. His dad is a loving mechanic, and David likes staying with him and helping out.

When they finally meet, it wakes up the free spirit in Jade, and they quickly become inseparable. Her mother and brother Keith (Rhys Wakefield) are happy that she’s venturing out into the world, while her father does everything he can to stop the relationship…

*

As I said, if you want originality, surprised, twists or refreshing dialogue, this is not your movie. That said, it’s not entirely without its own merits and additions to stereotypes:

–     The beautiful, rich girl is not bitchy, stupid or popular.

–     The poor boy is hot and nice enough. And he isn’t stupid.

–     None of the main characters has a deadly/incurable disease. Yes, the older brother has died of cancer, but since he is dead from the beginning, I’ll forgive him that.

–     Only one parent, from one side, is a jerk.

–    The soundtrack is decent.

–    The music festival and party dance games are a nice touch.

–     It’ light.

–     Did I mention none of the characters have Alzheimer’s? As much as it’s a tragic disease and a reality of life, sometimes you want to get away.

Watch the trailer. Adjust your expectations. And take off your movie critic hat. You might have a good time.

 

 More on Alex Pettyfer:

Magic Mike starring Channing Tatum, Alex Pettyfer, Matthew McConaughey & Cody Horn

Beastly starring Alex Pettyfer & Vanessa Hudgens

I Am Number Four starring Alex Pettyfer, Timothy Olyphant, Teresa Palmer & Dianna Agron

 

 

 

 

 

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Alex Pettyfer, bruce greenwood, endless love, endless love 2014 movie, endless love alex pettyfer, endless love cast, endless love movie review, endless love plot, gabriela wilde, joely Richardson, rhys wakefield

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 113
  • Next Page »

In the mood for a fun romcom novel?

Copyright © 2025 · Focus Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT