pinartarhan.com

Fun and comprehensive entertainment blog feat. movies, TV series, actors, movie-makers, music & books: 1980 - Present

  • Home
  • Hire Me
  • Privacy Policy
  • Books

Basic starring John Travolta, Connie Nielsen and Samuel L. Jackson

Posted on June 30, 2010 Written by ripitup

Share
Basic starring John Travolta, Connie Nielsen and Samuel L. Jackson
Basic starring John Travolta, Connie Nielsen and Samuel L. Jackson. Image via now-movies.com

Army Ranger Dunbar (Brian Van Holt) is being interrogated by Captain Julia Osborne (Connie Nielsen). The situation is very serious:  Dunbar’s team mates from Special Forces trainees and their sergeant  Nathan West (Samuel  L. Jackson) are all missing, presumed dead. The only other survivor aside from Dunbar is Kendall (Giovanni Ribisi), and he is lying in a hospital bed, in critical condition. There is a big chance Dunbar is guilty but when he says he will only talk to another ranger like him, Osborne’s supervisor Styles (Tim Daly) decides to call in a favor from his old friend/ex-Ranger Tom Hardy (John Travolta)- despite her objections.

Osborne and Hardy don’t at first get along that well. After all Hardy has left the army, is now a DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent.  It doesn’t help build her trust that there have been some bribery charges against him and he is sort of suspended.

But when Hardy proves himself as great an interrogator as Styles said he was, Osborne decides to follow his lead. After all, he has gotten both Kendall and Dunbar to talk. The problem is, their stories are contradicting. And even more confusing is the fact that Kendall seems to be showing Dunbar in a guilty light despite the fact that he saved Kendall’s life.

So what is the real story? Did one of the soldiers finally lose it because of how horribly West treated them? Or is it a whole lot more complicated than that?

I loved this movie. In fact, I adored it. I do have a weakness for John Travolta movies- especially thrillers:  Do Face Off, Broken Arrow, Swordfish, From Paris with Love, Mad City ring a bell? Yes, there are more but these are my favorites and Basic joined them right away. The difference of Basic,  though is that the action doesn’t exactly involve Travolta. We get flashbacks to the awful stormy location where the soldiers were supposed to complete their training. There is great suspense and as many great twists as in a John Grisham novel. I loved how the story surprises and entertains and impresses you at all times. The movie, in my opinion is horribly underrated at 6.3 on IMDB. I think it is a solid 8 but I rated a 9 for the entertainment level and frankly to get the movie closer to the rating it deserves. Written by James Vanderbilt. Directed by John McTiernan.

A very strong drama/thriller with a great cast. Now, that’s my kind of movie .

Posts featuring Travolta:

Hairspray

From Paris with Love

Actor Musicians and Musician Actors

Favorite Actors to Play Villains

 

Buy Basic on Amazon.com

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Basic, Brian Van Holt, connie nielsen, drama, Giovanni Ribisi, James Vanderbilt, John McTiernan, John Travolta, movies, Samuel L. Jackson, thriller

Bright Star starring Abbie Cornish, Ben Whishaw and Paul Schneider

Posted on June 29, 2010 Written by ripitup

Share
Bright Star starring Abbie Cornish, Ben Whishaw and Paul Schneider
Bright Star starring Abbie Cornish, Ben Whishaw and Paul Schneider. Written and directed by Jane Campion. Image from http://theoscarboy.files.wordpress.com

So I kept hearing so much about The Piano all these years. You probably have heard of it, even if you haven’t seen it. Critically acclaimed, Oscar-winner and all that. And I thought it was time I should watch this popular Jane Campion film. Since I was going to watch it, I took the chance to watch Bright Star before. It was directed by Campion as well, rated at 7.2 on IMDB, a period drama starring Ben Whishaw and Abby Cornish. How could they go wrong?  Beautiful leads, romantic setting and me- someone belonging exactly to the targeted audience: romantic female with a weakness for period films. My favorite movies include Pride and Prejudice and I have written articles about the period movies to watch (Period Movies: The Costumes, The Settings and The Romance).

But watching to movie, I failed to be intrigued by any character or line. In fact, I hated Mr. Brown and Paul Schnedier’s interpretation of him. The scenes are mostly too long, boring and/or mundane. This is not how an engaging drama should work. The movie did not have one fun  moment in its body. And what on earth did they get the talented Thomas Sangster for? His character barely spoke and added nothing to the story. That boy is talented and he is often seen in fun roles- that have lines and action. Remember the kid in Love Actually? And Ceasar in The Last Legion?

You can bet I am a little concerned about watching The Piano now. While I love Harvey Keitel, and the premise sounds very interesting, I am not sure if it will be a worthwhile experience. But of course I will watch it anyway.

The plot? Oh that:

England, 19th century. Young and beautiful Fanny Brawne (Abby Cornish) is fascinated by fashion and clothing and designs and makes all her clothes.

Young poet John Keates is striving to make money with his work and is often working with Mr. Brown. As much as Mr. Brown and Fanny hate each other, a romance eventually blossoms between Fanny and Keats. The fact that he can’t support himself , that he is mostly dependent on Brown as a writing mate and more, complicate things. Love would probably conquer all but then Keats falls terminally ill…

Yes, Keats is a real poet that lived in that period. And his real life couldn’t have been this boring, could it? Yes, there are many who enjoyed this film, hence the 7.2 rating but I am just not one of them. 4-5/10.

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Abbie Cornish, Ben Whishaw, Bright Star, drama, Jane Campion, John Keats, Paul Schneider, period drama, period dramas, romance

Chloe starring Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson and Amanda Seyfried

Posted on June 25, 2010 Written by ripitup

Share
Chloe starring Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson and Amanda Seyfried
Chloe starring Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson and Amanda Seyfried. Image from http://moviecultists.com

And there will be SPOILERS

Well, there will be-not because I want to tell you the ending- but because you will know what to expect from the movie.

The Plot

Catherine Stewart (Julianne Moore) is going through a very problematic and lonely time in her life: Her husband D avid (Liam Neeson) seems to be evasive, negligent and overly flirting with other women. Well, younger and beautiful women, to be exact. To top this, her son Michael (Max Thieriot) seems to despise her and is a lot closer to his father.

At this particular juncture in her life, she runs into a very beautiful young woman named Chloe (Amanda Seyfried). Chloe is an expensive hooker/escort who Catherine used to see with different men from her office window. Yeah, Catherine is an expensive gynecologist with a big office and an amazing house and they hang out in the same neighborhoods.

Anyway, one day, a desperate Catherine gets to meet Chloe. And no longer able to stand the suspicions about her husband, she hires Chloe to see if she can seduce her husband. She does, as expected, and reports back to Catherine.

Now, of course, this is the point where you expect any woman to do one of the following:

–          To confront David and to either forgive or dump him.

–          Or not confront him and just deal with it on her own.

–          Or maybe have a little affair of her own out of spite/revenge.

I am guessing, however, you don’t expect her to be turned on by Chloe’s storytelling about how she slept with her husband and you definitely don’t expect Catherine to sleep with Chloe.

OK, I am guessing, some of the men would expect or at least want Chloe and Catherine to get together. So to satisfy your curiousity, there is a sex scene with nudity. And it doesn’t involve Liam Neeson.

Having gotten that out of the way, the movie takes a turn where Chloe is obsessed with Catherine. Maybe she was from the beginning, but it becomes much more apparent. She would be more than willing to be her girlfriend. Of course Catherine wants none of that. So Chloe goes after the son. Why not the husband, if he enjoyed the affair as much as she described? Maybe because he never slept with her in the first place and all the scenes Chloe described were nothing more than detailed storytelling?

I will admit that the movie is not exactly boring. However, the writing doesn’t really flow naturally. Sure, it is an original twist, compared to other “fatal attraction” sort of movies where the woman had an actual affair with the man and then threatened the whole family  because she wanted the man. Herevwe have a girl who wanted the woman. And she was never really a violent threat, but an obsessed and emotional one who did everything to get closer to Catherine, rather than destroy her.

But how is it supposed to make sense that a woman who has been heterosexual all her life, depressed about her son and husband, will hire a prostitute to prove he is cheating and then accept her words as proof? So you don’t believe your husband? Fine, hire a P.I. Because P.I.s aren’t paid to tell stories. They are paid to show proof: video, photographs…You know, actual proof.

And why would you send the hooker to seduce him? There is a big chance that she could want him for herself. He is handsome, well-off and well, nice! So let’s say that you are so desperate, you don’t think naturally and you did hire her. And you believed her. When did you decide to sleep with her???

I know writing a good screenplay is difficult. And while this one makes an OK job for the most part, some things just don’t really add up. How stupid can a woman be? So she slept with her. Wasn’t she supposed to wake up about how obsessed Chloe was when she didn’t want money or wanted to give her hairpin that was given to her by her mother…How twisted is that?

Oh- and then there is the scene where she does prove to herself, unexpectedly, that in fact her husband never cheated.  He was so hurt and disappointed. Do you think he would have forgiven her so easily if she had slept with a man? Oh, you might see the ending coming. But you may or may not see the final scene coming. I am wondering whether you would say “Great job” or “Come on!!! You have got to be kidding me!”

While the director is a man (Atom Egoyan), I am surprised to see that the screenwriters are women.  It might be old-fashioned of me but I find everything in the movie very hard to relate to, as a woman. I also find it hardly believable that Liam Neeson’s  character would actually say no to all women, even though they weren’t really having sex anymore and his gorgeous female students were probably coming on to him. I am not just buying that. Call me a cynic.

I do, however, have to admit that this movie is much more intriguing than the last love triangle movie I saw Liam Neeson in. That time he wasn’t suspected of cheating or wasn’t flirting with anyone. He was being cheated on by his beloved wife who was cheating on him with Antonio Banderas’ character. The movie was called The Other Man.

I think I should give this movie a 6, that is the highest rating I can give. It had its moments and it certainly had flaws. Tell me you didn’t see Liam wasn’t cheating the moment we weren’t given actual scenes but just story telling from Chloe?

If you like dramas/thrillers, twisted characters with the most irrational behavior and the actors, see it. It is a 6.6 on IMDB.

Other Posts on Liam Neeson

Kingdom of Heaven starring Orlando Bloom, Neeson, Eva Green

Seraphim Falls starring Neeson and Pierce Brosnan

The Other Man starring Neeson and Banderas

Buy Chloe on Amazon.com

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: Amanda Seyfried, Atom Egoyan, Chloe, drama, Julianne Moore, Liam Neeson, Max Thieriot, movies, thriller

The Best Man starring Richard Coyle, Keeley Hawes and Toby Stephens

Posted on June 24, 2010 Written by ripitup

Share
The Best Man starring Richard Coyle, Toby Stephens and Keeley Hawes
The Best Man starring Richard Coyle, Toby Stephens and

Mike (Richard Coyle) tries to kill himself. From the beginning of the movie, we are given hints here and there through flashback that he and his best friend Peter (Toby Stephens) might not have the healthiest relationship- not with each other and definitely not with others. Mike spends time in a mental institution where his therapist suggests that he should move on from Peter. This doesn’t seem that difficult at first, especially not since he has fallen for Kate (Keeley Hawes), another patient. When they leave, Mike moves out of his place with Peter and moves in with her. Peter decides to let his hostility go and tries to get along with Kate. Or at least pretends to. And for a while everything is okay. However, as the audience is given more and more hitns about how dark a secret these two old friends might be keeping since they were teenagers, we know it is silence before the storm. The silence breaks when Mike and Kate decide to get married and Peter sees someone from their past. From then on, Peter will crash the honeymoon, try to drive Kate and Mike apart. And just when you think he has failed, he just might succeed…

And no, the last line for the summary is not the summary. The movie is made for TV and it consists of two parts so it’s not short. The honery moon is like the beginning of a nightmare.

Now, for the most part, this is a smart,intense and intelligent movie. It balances drama well with suspense. It is not pretentious and it doesn’t usually try to be smarter than the audience. However, its potential eventually lets you know.

This is a good film with some good acting but the closer you get to the climax, the closer this UK film gets to a an average American thriller. You know, you have guessed the killer right. And there are blonde women acting not so intelligently. And the dreaded part where you guess the exact ending…

I’ll give it to the screenwriter that it is not always predictable and it provided some nice surprises. The sad part is, you get the predictability at the places you wish you hadn’t.

The best thing about the film is no doubt Richard Coyle. I am guessing it would and could have been a more intense and chilling experience, had I found the film’s DVD. I had to watch it in many party on youtube. And there is no doubting Coyle’s acting talent because his Jeffish haircut, he totally makes you forget his Coupling character Jeff Murdoch as soon as the credits roll. Toby Stephens and Kelley Hawes are good too. I think the “wrongfully framed son” should have gotten more screen time and more reasoning on how on earth he could have gotten “framed” or at least suspected terribly.

It could have been an 8. It is a 6/10 drama/thriller with 7 and 8 moments.  Despite the ending, it is worth seeing. You can watch it on youtube.

Share

Filed Under: Movies and Actors Tagged With: drama, Keeley Hawes, Richard Coyle, The Best Man, thriller, Toby Stephens

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • …
  • 152
  • Next Page »

In the mood for a fun romcom novel?

Copyright © 2026 · Focus Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT